Table 2 |
||||||
|
Experimentation results for recognizing spatial attribute of events based on statistical machine learning approach |
||||||
|
Features |
Machine learning techniques |
Event class |
||||
|
|
||||||
|
Normal |
Reporting |
Information |
Hypothetical |
Over all |
||
|
|
||||||
|
11 location-related features |
CRF |
84.8 (85.8,83.8) |
82.7 (81.9,83.5) |
62.6 (63.0,62.2) |
88.1 (92.5,84.1) |
81.3 (81.9,80.7) |
|
SVM |
84.6 (85.8,83.5) |
83.7 (82.7,84.6) |
54.8 (55.2,54.5) |
81.0 (85.0,77.3) |
80.0 (80.7,79.4) |
|
|
C4.5 |
78.8 (79.6,77.9) |
85.7 (85.2,86.2) |
44.3 (45.0,43.6) |
64.4 (65.1,63.6) |
74.9 (75.5,74.4) |
|
|
|
||||||
|
11 location-related features + event class |
CRF |
87.2 (88.3,86.1) |
86.1 (85.6,86.6) |
68.2 (68.4,67.9) |
76.2 (80.0,72.7) |
83.8 (84.5,83.1) |
|
SVM |
86.6 (87.7,85.5) |
83.7 (82.7,84.6) |
65.8 (66.2,65.4) |
78.6 (82.5,75.0) |
82.6 (83.3,82.0) |
|
|
C4.5 |
82.8 (84.1,81.6) |
88.4 (87.9,88.9) |
55.3 (56.8,53.8) |
78.2 (79.1,77.3) |
80.1 (81.0,79.2) |
|
|
|
||||||
|
11 location-related features + subject type |
CRF |
85.7 (87.4,84.1) |
85.8 (84.9,86.6) |
75.5 (76.0,75.0) |
80.95 (85.0,77.3) |
84.1 (85.1,83.1) |
|
SVM |
84.8 (86.4,83.2) |
83.7 (82.7,84.6) |
58.7 (59.1,58.3) |
83.3 (87.5,79.5) |
80.8 (81.6,79.9) |
|
|
C4.5 |
79.5 (80.8,78.3) |
87.2 (86.3,88.0) |
61.3 (61.1,61.5) |
61.2 (61.9,60.5) |
78.0 (78.5,77.4) |
|
|
|
||||||
|
11 location-related features + subject type + event class |
CRF |
86.7 (88.1,85.4) |
87.1 (86.4,87.8) |
80.4 (80.6,80.1) |
76.2 (80.0,72.7) |
85.5 (86.3,84.7) |
|
SVM |
86.1 (87.8,84.4) |
84.0 (83.1,84.4) |
68.4 (68.8,67.9) |
81.0 (85.0,77.3) |
82.8 (83.7,82.0) |
|
|
C4.5 |
80.2 (80.9,79.5) |
88.0 (87.5,88.5) |
66.7 (68.7,64.7) |
64.4 (65.1,63.6) |
79.5 (80.1,78.8) |
|
|
|
||||||
|
The attribute annotation results shown in this table were based on micro-averaging. The scores are shown in the form of "F-score (precision, recall)" |
||||||
|
Chanlekha and Collier Journal of Biomedical Semantics 2010 1:3 doi:10.1186/2041-1480-1-3 |
||||||